While describing the terrorist crime in Shiraz as a sign of the defeat of the conspirators against Islamic Iran in soft war and physical war, the member of the Supreme Council of the AhlulBayt (a.s.) World Assembly stated, “All efforts to destroy the strength of the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran and popular approval of this country failed.”

During the last half century, the noble nation of Iran has proved that by obeying the leadership and vigilant clerics, it stands up against all hardships in the way of the teachings of the Quran and AhlulBayt (a.s.), as well as raising the flag of monotheism, and with such humiliating and cowardly actions, they will not retreat from their revolutionary positions and patriotic duties.

As a member of the General Assembly of the AhlulBayt (a.s.) World Assembly, the late Ayatollah Vahedi actively participated in the meeting and activities of the Assembly, and by establishing good relations with scholars and the Sunni Muslim community, he was influential in strengthening the foundations of Islamic unity.

The leader of Iraq’s National Wisdom Movement denounced the ISIS terrorist attack on worshipers and pilgrims at the shrine of Ahmad bin Musa bin Jafar (a.s.), also known as Shah Cheragh, in Shiraz.

Ayatollah Dorri Najafabadi stated, “The Iranian nation is always vigilant and aware of the conspiracies of its enemies and does not allow outsiders to interfere in the country’s internal affairs. Because the nation knows very well that foreigners have never been sympathetic and benevolent to the Iranian nation.”

Dr. Ali Akbar Velayati emphasized, “The Islamic Republic of Iran is at the heart of the Resistance Front and works alongside Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine and Iraq.”

Secretary-General of the AhlulBayt (a.s.) World Assembly said, “The nation of Afghanistan should be proud to have Ayatollah Asif Mohseni. He was both an alem and a mujahid.”

The president of Khatam al-Nabiyin (p.b.u.h) University stated, “Ayatollah Asif Mohseni was the flag bearer of the proximity discourse and had scientific and practical innovation in this regard.”